Como vs Manning

Como scores higher on walkability (60/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Manning (1087) sits above Como (1085). Manning skews owner-occupied (67%), Como runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

Buying in Como or Manning?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Como? The free selling guide

Como and Manning side by side

MeasureComoManning
Price and market
Median house$1,330,000–
Median unit$613,000–
Renting
Owner occupied55.0%67.0%
Renter occupied40.0%31.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10851087
Lifestyle and people
Walk score6012
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population14,7864,219
Median age3838
Climate
Annual rainfall701 mm701 mm
Mean max, January31.1°C31.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Manning edges out on average school ICSEA (1087 vs 1085). Manning also has a higher family-household share (73% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Como vs Manning: common questions

Does Como or Manning have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Manning scores 1087 vs 1085 in Como. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Como or Manning?

Como scores 60/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.