Conargo vs Wandook

Conargo scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Conargo skews owner-occupied (58%), Wandook runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

Buying in Conargo or Wandook?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Conargo? The free selling guide

Conargo and Wandook side by side

MeasureConargoWandook
Renting
House rent$450/wk$450/wk
Unit rent$260/wk$260/wk
Owner occupied58.0%45.0%
Renter occupied9.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby86
Average ICSEA943943
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population11736
Median age4849
Climate
Annual rainfall369 mm371 mm
Mean max, January33.1°C33.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Conargo vs Wandook: common questions

Which is more walkable, Conargo or Wandook?

Conargo scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.