Connells Point vs Hurstville Grove.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Connells Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Connells Point scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Connells Point (1084) sits above Hurstville Grove (1083).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Connells Point edges out on average school ICSEA (1084 vs 1083).
Common questions
Does Connells Point or Hurstville Grove have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Connells Point scores 1084 vs 1083 in Hurstville Grove. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Connells Point or Hurstville Grove?
Connells Point scores 28/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Connells Point against another suburb