Cook vs Weetangera.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,262,500 and $1,250,000.
Weetangera (median $1,250,000) is roughly 1% cheaper to buy into than Cook ($1,262,500).
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cook (1089) sits above Weetangera (1082).
For buyers
Weetangera is the lower entry point at $1,250,000 median, 1% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Weetangera offers the higher gross rental yield (1.74% vs 1.72%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
Cook edges out on average school ICSEA (1089 vs 1082). Weetangera also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Is Cook or Weetangera cheaper to buy in?
Weetangera has the lower median house price at $1,250,000, roughly 1% below Cook ($1,262,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Cook or Weetangera have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cook scores 1089 vs 1082 in Weetangera. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Cook or Weetangera?
Gross rental yield on houses is 1.74% in Weetangera vs 1.72% in Cook. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Cook against another suburb