Coonalpyn vs Field

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coonalpyn (975) sits above Field (942).

Buying in Coonalpyn or Field?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Coonalpyn? The free selling guide

Coonalpyn and Field side by side

MeasureCoonalpynField
Renting
House rent$320/wk–
Unit rent$150/wk–
Owner occupied67.0%68.0%
Renter occupied22.0%32.0%
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA975942
Lifestyle and people
Walk score8–
Transit score0–
Bike score5–
Population35083
Median age5043
Climate
Annual rainfall429 mm457 mm
Mean max, January29.1°C28.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Coonalpyn edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 942). Field also has a higher family-household share (68% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Coonalpyn vs Field: common questions

Does Coonalpyn or Field have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coonalpyn scores 975 vs 942 in Field. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.