Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coondoo vs Wolvi.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coondoo edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coondoo (986) sits above Wolvi (964). Wolvi skews owner-occupied (82%), Coondoo runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coondoo edges out on average school ICSEA (986 vs 964).

Common questionsCoondoo vs Wolvi

Common questions

Does Coondoo or Wolvi have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coondoo scores 986 vs 964 in Wolvi. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coondoo
Metric
Wolvi

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$365/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$270/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
43
Population
521
58
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
19
986
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).