Coongoola vs Cunnamulla

Cunnamulla scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 64/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Coongoola or Cunnamulla?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Coongoola? The free selling guide

Coongoola and Cunnamulla side by side

MeasureCoongoolaCunnamulla
Renting
Owner occupied–50.0%
Renter occupied–43.0%
Schools
Schools nearby02
Average ICSEA–785
Lifestyle and people
Walk score064
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population161,233
Median age4040
Climate
Annual rainfall365 mm366 mm
Mean max, January36.6°C37.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Coongoola has a heavier family-household mix (150% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Coongoola vs Cunnamulla: common questions

Which is more walkable, Coongoola or Cunnamulla?

Cunnamulla scores 64/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Coongoola and Cunnamulla?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide