Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cope vs Cooks Gap.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,175,000 and $782,500. Cooks Gap edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Cooks Gap (median $782,500) is roughly 50% cheaper to buy into than Cope ($1,175,000).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Cooks Gap is the lower entry point at $782,500 median, 50% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Cooks Gap offers the higher gross rental yield (2.39% vs 1.33%), favouring cash-flow investors.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsCope vs Cooks Gap

Common questions

Is Cope or Cooks Gap cheaper to buy in?

Cooks Gap has the lower median house price at $782,500, roughly 50% below Cope ($1,175,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Cope or Cooks Gap?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.39% in Cooks Gap vs 1.33% in Cope. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Cope
Metric
Cooks Gap

Price & Market

$1,175,000
Median house
$782,500
$240,480
Median unit
$274,320
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
85.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
113
Population
549
43
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
913
Avg ICSEA
913

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).