Your Property Guide

Copeton vs Gum Flat

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gum Flat (917) sits above Copeton (888). Gum Flat skews owner-occupied (85%), Copeton runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

Buying in Copeton or Gum Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Copeton? The free selling guide

Copeton and Gum Flat side by side

MeasureCopetonGum Flat
Renting
House rent$480/wk$480/wk
Unit rent$325/wk$325/wk
Owner occupied53.0%85.0%
Renter occupied–12.0%
Schools
Schools nearby107
Average ICSEA888917
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population57209
Median age4445
Climate
Annual rainfall746 mm777 mm
Mean max, January31.1°C30.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Gum Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (917 vs 888).

Copeton vs Gum Flat: common questions

Does Copeton or Gum Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gum Flat scores 917 vs 888 in Copeton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Copeton and Gum Flat?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide