Side by sideSuburb comparison

Copeville vs Claypans.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Copeville edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Copeville (951) sits above Claypans (946). Claypans skews owner-occupied (100%), Copeville runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Copeville edges out on average school ICSEA (951 vs 946). Claypans also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCopeville vs Claypans

Common questions

Does Copeville or Claypans have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Copeville scores 951 vs 946 in Claypans. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Copeville
Metric
Claypans

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$123/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$215/wk
$80/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$183/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
44
Population
4
47
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
951
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).