Side by sideSuburb comparison

Copley vs Clackline.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Copley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Copley (955) sits above Clackline (904). Clackline skews owner-occupied (84%), Copley runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Copley edges out on average school ICSEA (955 vs 904).

Common questionsCopley vs Clackline

Common questions

Does Copley or Clackline have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Copley scores 955 vs 904 in Clackline. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Copley
Metric
Clackline

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$273/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
70
Population
330
46
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
9
955
Avg ICSEA
904

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).