Side by sideSuburb comparison

Copmanhurst vs Upper Copmanhurst.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Copmanhurst edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Copmanhurst (931) sits above Upper Copmanhurst (916). Upper Copmanhurst skews owner-occupied (98%), Copmanhurst runs more rental-dense (84% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Copmanhurst edges out on average school ICSEA (931 vs 916).

Common questionsCopmanhurst vs Upper Copmanhurst

Common questions

Does Copmanhurst or Upper Copmanhurst have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Copmanhurst scores 931 vs 916 in Upper Copmanhurst. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Copmanhurst
Metric
Upper Copmanhurst

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$285/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$239/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
98.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
344
Population
99
50
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
18
931
Avg ICSEA
916

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).