Coquette Point vs Coconuts

Coconuts scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Coquette Point skews owner-occupied (89%), Coconuts runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

Buying in Coquette Point or Coconuts?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Coquette Point? The free selling guide

Coquette Point and Coconuts side by side

MeasureCoquette PointCoconuts
Renting
Owner occupied89.0%62.0%
Renter occupied7.0%38.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1010
Average ICSEA877877
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population117216
Median age5956
Climate
Annual rainfall3330 mm3390 mm
Mean max, January30.8°C31.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Coquette Point vs Coconuts: common questions

Which is more walkable, Coquette Point or Coconuts?

Coconuts scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.