Side by sideSuburb comparison

Corella vs North Deep Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Corella edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Corella (967) sits above North Deep Creek (960). Corella skews owner-occupied (123%), North Deep Creek runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Corella edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 960). Corella also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCorella vs North Deep Creek

Common questions

Does Corella or North Deep Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Corella scores 967 vs 960 in North Deep Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Corella
Metric
North Deep Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
123.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
68
Population
388
43
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
5
967
Avg ICSEA
960

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).