Corndale vs Casterton

Casterton scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Corndale or Casterton?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Corndale? The free selling guide

Corndale and Casterton side by side

MeasureCorndaleCasterton
Price and market
Median house–$269,000
Median unit–$110,880
Renting
Owner occupied–79.0%
Renter occupied–14.0%
Schools
Schools nearby33
Average ICSEA975975
Lifestyle and people
Walk score04
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population–1,673
Median age–58
Climate
Annual rainfall654 mm651 mm
Mean max, January27.2°C27.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Corndale vs Casterton: common questions

Which is more walkable, Corndale or Casterton?

Casterton scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.