Side by sideSuburb comparison

Couta Rocks vs Redpa.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Couta Rocks edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Couta Rocks (984) sits above Redpa (899). Couta Rocks skews owner-occupied (100%), Redpa runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Couta Rocks edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 899). Couta Rocks also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 69%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCouta Rocks vs Redpa

Common questions

Does Couta Rocks or Redpa have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Couta Rocks scores 984 vs 899 in Redpa. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Couta Rocks
Metric
Redpa

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$187/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
7
Population
106
69
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
6
984
Avg ICSEA
899

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).