Cromarty vs Shirbourne
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cromarty (958) sits above Shirbourne (914). Cromarty skews owner-occupied (100%), Shirbourne runs more rental-dense (70% owner).
Buying in Cromarty or Shirbourne?
Selling in Cromarty? The free selling guide
Cromarty and Shirbourne side by side
| Measure | Cromarty | Shirbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 100.0% | 70.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 20.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 20 |
| Average ICSEA | 958 | 914 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 43 | 48 |
| Median age | 56 | 42 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1177 mm | 1073 mm |
| Mean max, January | 31.4°C | 32.0°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Cromarty edges out on average school ICSEA (958 vs 914).
Cromarty vs Shirbourne: common questions
Does Cromarty or Shirbourne have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cromarty scores 958 vs 914 in Shirbourne. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Cromarty with
Choosing between Cromarty and Shirbourne?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.