Cuballing vs Yornaning

Cuballing scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cuballing skews owner-occupied (86%), Yornaning runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

Buying in Cuballing or Yornaning?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cuballing? The free selling guide

Cuballing and Yornaning side by side

MeasureCuballingYornaning
Renting
House rent$216/wk$216/wk
Unit rent$280/wk$165/wk
Owner occupied86.0%57.0%
Renter occupied11.0%43.0%
Schools
Schools nearby57
Average ICSEA946946
Lifestyle and people
Walk score60
Transit score00
Bike score025
Population45649
Median age5245
Climate
Annual rainfall429 mm422 mm
Mean max, January31.5°C31.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cuballing has a heavier family-household mix (73% vs 57%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Cuballing vs Yornaning: common questions

Which is more walkable, Cuballing or Yornaning?

Cuballing scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.