Cudgegong vs Apple Tree Flat

Apple Tree Flat scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cudgegong (954) sits above Apple Tree Flat (942). Apple Tree Flat skews owner-occupied (106%), Cudgegong runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

Buying in Cudgegong or Apple Tree Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cudgegong? The free selling guide

Cudgegong and Apple Tree Flat side by side

MeasureCudgegongApple Tree Flat
Renting
House rent$650/wk$650/wk
Unit rent$450/wk$450/wk
Owner occupied75.0%106.0%
Renter occupied13.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby25
Average ICSEA954942
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population6646
Median age5149
Climate
Annual rainfall737 mm732 mm
Mean max, January29.5°C29.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cudgegong edges out on average school ICSEA (954 vs 942).

Cudgegong vs Apple Tree Flat: common questions

Does Cudgegong or Apple Tree Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cudgegong scores 954 vs 942 in Apple Tree Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Cudgegong or Apple Tree Flat?

Apple Tree Flat scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.