Cumnock vs Yullundry

Cumnock scores higher on walkability (10/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Yullundry (940) sits above Cumnock (922). Cumnock skews owner-occupied (79%), Yullundry runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

Buying in Cumnock or Yullundry?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cumnock? The free selling guide

Cumnock and Yullundry side by side

MeasureCumnockYullundry
Renting
Owner occupied79.0%50.0%
Renter occupied15.0%75.0%
Schools
Schools nearby103
Average ICSEA922940
Lifestyle and people
Walk score100
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population49135
Median age4416
Climate
Annual rainfall658 mm610 mm
Mean max, January31.4°C32.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Yullundry edges out on average school ICSEA (940 vs 922). Yullundry also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 73%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Cumnock vs Yullundry: common questions

Does Cumnock or Yullundry have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Yullundry scores 940 vs 922 in Cumnock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Cumnock or Yullundry?

Cumnock scores 10/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.