Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cungulla vs Cromarty.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cromarty edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cromarty (958) sits above Cungulla (941). Cromarty skews owner-occupied (100%), Cungulla runs more rental-dense (85% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cromarty edges out on average school ICSEA (958 vs 941).

Common questionsCungulla vs Cromarty

Common questions

Does Cungulla or Cromarty have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cromarty scores 958 vs 941 in Cungulla. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cungulla
Metric
Cromarty

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
85.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
307
Population
43
58
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
941
Avg ICSEA
958

Climate

1036 mm
Annual rainfall
1036 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).