Cunliffe vs Matta Flat
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cunliffe (944) sits above Matta Flat (933). Matta Flat skews owner-occupied (83%), Cunliffe runs more rental-dense (73% owner).
Buying in Cunliffe or Matta Flat?
Selling in Cunliffe? The free selling guide
Cunliffe and Matta Flat side by side
| Measure | Cunliffe | Matta Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 73.0% | 83.0% |
| Renter occupied | 14.0% | 17.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 3 | 5 |
| Average ICSEA | 944 | 933 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 5 |
| Population | 50 | 82 |
| Median age | 49 | 43 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 373 mm | 361 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.5°C | 30.9°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Cunliffe edges out on average school ICSEA (944 vs 933). Matta Flat also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 73%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Cunliffe vs Matta Flat: common questions
Does Cunliffe or Matta Flat have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cunliffe scores 944 vs 933 in Matta Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Cunliffe with
Choosing between Cunliffe and Matta Flat?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.