Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cunningham vs Wheatvale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cunningham edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cunningham (957) sits above Wheatvale (954).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cunningham edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 954).

Common questionsCunningham vs Wheatvale

Common questions

Does Cunningham or Wheatvale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cunningham scores 957 vs 954 in Wheatvale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cunningham
Metric
Wheatvale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$221/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$155/wk
Owner occupied
53.0%
Renter occupied
47.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
19,195
Population
57
45
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
13
957
Avg ICSEA
954

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).