Cunningham vs James Well

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving James Well (933) sits above Cunningham (932). James Well skews owner-occupied (87%), Cunningham runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

Buying in Cunningham or James Well?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cunningham? The free selling guide

Cunningham and James Well side by side

MeasureCunninghamJames Well
Renting
House rent–$380/wk
Unit rent–$248/wk
Owner occupied59.0%87.0%
Renter occupied14.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby34
Average ICSEA932933
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population7863
Median age3566
Climate
Annual rainfall416 mm364 mm
Mean max, January29.1°C29.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
James Well edges out on average school ICSEA (933 vs 932). Cunningham also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 53%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Cunningham vs James Well: common questions

Does Cunningham or James Well have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), James Well scores 933 vs 932 in Cunningham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.