Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cuprona vs Stowport.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Stowport edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stowport (930) sits above Cuprona (919). Stowport skews owner-occupied (80%), Cuprona runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Stowport edges out on average school ICSEA (930 vs 919).

Common questionsCuprona vs Stowport

Common questions

Does Cuprona or Stowport have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stowport scores 930 vs 919 in Cuprona. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cuprona
Metric
Stowport

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
140
Population
446
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
11
919
Avg ICSEA
930

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).