Dakenba vs Biloela

Biloela scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Dakenba skews owner-occupied (75%), Biloela runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

Buying in Dakenba or Biloela?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Dakenba? The free selling guide

Dakenba and Biloela side by side

MeasureDakenbaBiloela
Price and market
Median house–$315,000
Median unit–$280,000
Renting
House rent–$420/wk
Unit rent–$300/wk
Owner occupied75.0%58.0%
Renter occupied23.0%39.0%
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA963963
Lifestyle and people
Walk score0100
Transit score00
Bike score70100
Population1275,692
Median age4436
Climate
Annual rainfall575 mm576 mm
Mean max, January33.6°C33.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Dakenba has a heavier family-household mix (93% vs 69%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Dakenba vs Biloela: common questions

Which is more walkable, Dakenba or Biloela?

Biloela scores 100/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.