Your Property Guide

Duck Ponds vs Port Lincoln

Port Lincoln scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 66/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Duck Ponds skews owner-occupied (84%), Port Lincoln runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

Buying in Duck Ponds or Port Lincoln?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Duck Ponds? The free selling guide

Duck Ponds and Port Lincoln side by side

MeasureDuck PondsPort Lincoln
Renting
Owner occupied84.0%62.0%
Renter occupied32.0%34.0%
Schools
Schools nearby88
Average ICSEA922922
Lifestyle and people
Walk score066
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population28414,458
Median age4641
Climate
Annual rainfall524 mm515 mm
Mean max, January25.6°C25.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Duck Ponds has a heavier family-household mix (76% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Duck Ponds vs Port Lincoln: common questions

Which is more walkable, Duck Ponds or Port Lincoln?

Port Lincoln scores 66/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Duck Ponds and Port Lincoln?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide