Side by sideSuburb comparison

Duckenfield vs Millers Forest.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Duckenfield edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Duckenfield (948) sits above Millers Forest (939). Duckenfield skews owner-occupied (94%), Millers Forest runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Duckenfield edges out on average school ICSEA (948 vs 939). Millers Forest also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsDuckenfield vs Millers Forest

Common questions

Does Duckenfield or Millers Forest have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Duckenfield scores 948 vs 939 in Millers Forest. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Duckenfield
Metric
Millers Forest

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$427/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$315/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$395/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
92
Population
357
49
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
948
Avg ICSEA
939

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).