Side by sideSuburb comparison

Epsom vs Nebo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Nebo scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Epsom (937) sits above Nebo (899).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Epsom edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 899).

Common questionsEpsom vs Nebo

Common questions

Does Epsom or Nebo have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Epsom scores 937 vs 899 in Nebo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Epsom or Nebo?

Nebo scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Epsom
Metric
Nebo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$277/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$279/wk
Owner occupied
52.0%
Renter occupied
43.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
14
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
7,346
Population
857
44
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
1
937
Avg ICSEA
899

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).