Epsom vs Whipstick

Epsom scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Epsom (975) sits above Whipstick (945).

Buying in Epsom or Whipstick?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Epsom? The free selling guide

Epsom and Whipstick side by side

MeasureEpsomWhipstick
Price and market
Median house$632,500–
Median unit$257,760–
Schools
Schools nearby2012
Average ICSEA975945
Lifestyle and people
Walk score160
Transit score00
Bike score1000
Population–18
Median age–43
Climate
Annual rainfall481 mm474 mm
Mean max, January30.4°C30.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Epsom edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 945).

Epsom vs Whipstick: common questions

Does Epsom or Whipstick have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Epsom scores 975 vs 945 in Whipstick. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Epsom or Whipstick?

Epsom scores 16/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.