Erskine vs Falcon

Falcon scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Erskine (970) sits above Falcon (969).

Buying in Erskine or Falcon?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Erskine? The free selling guide

Erskine and Falcon side by side

MeasureErskineFalcon
Renting
Owner occupied72.0%75.0%
Renter occupied19.0%23.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2012
Average ICSEA970969
Lifestyle and people
Walk score46
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population5,4295,531
Median age6150
Climate
Annual rainfall702 mm700 mm
Mean max, January29.6°C29.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Erskine edges out on average school ICSEA (970 vs 969).

Erskine vs Falcon: common questions

Does Erskine or Falcon have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Erskine scores 970 vs 969 in Falcon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Erskine or Falcon?

Falcon scores 6/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.