Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ettrick vs Burdett.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ettrick edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ettrick (933) sits above Burdett (928). Ettrick skews owner-occupied (77%), Burdett runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ettrick edges out on average school ICSEA (933 vs 928). Ettrick also has a higher family-household share (92% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsEttrick vs Burdett

Common questions

Does Ettrick or Burdett have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ettrick scores 933 vs 928 in Burdett. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ettrick
Metric
Burdett

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
38.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
37
Population
234
40
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
10
933
Avg ICSEA
928

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).