Side by sideSuburb comparison

Everard Central vs Blyth.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Blyth edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Blyth (994) sits above Everard Central (980). Blyth skews owner-occupied (80%), Everard Central runs more rental-dense (42% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Blyth edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 980). Blyth also has a higher family-household share (73% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsEverard Central vs Blyth

Common questions

Does Everard Central or Blyth have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Blyth scores 994 vs 980 in Everard Central. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Everard Central
Metric
Blyth

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$227/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
42.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
33
Population
518
52
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
5
980
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).