Farina vs Lyndhurst

Farina scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Lyndhurst skews owner-occupied (100%), Farina runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

Buying in Farina or Lyndhurst?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Farina? The free selling guide

Farina and Lyndhurst side by side

MeasureFarinaLyndhurst
Renting
Owner occupied38.0%100.0%
Schools
Schools nearby01
Average ICSEA–791
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population153
Median age5955
Climate
Annual rainfall163 mm171 mm
Mean max, January37.8°C37.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Farina vs Lyndhurst: common questions

Which is more walkable, Farina or Lyndhurst?

Farina scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.