Field vs Coonalpyn

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coonalpyn (975) sits above Field (942).

Buying in Field or Coonalpyn?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Field? The free selling guide

Field and Coonalpyn side by side

MeasureFieldCoonalpyn
Renting
House rent–$320/wk
Unit rent–$150/wk
Owner occupied68.0%67.0%
Renter occupied32.0%22.0%
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA942975
Lifestyle and people
Walk score–8
Transit score–0
Bike score–5
Population83350
Median age4350
Climate
Annual rainfall457 mm429 mm
Mean max, January28.0°C29.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Coonalpyn edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 942). Field also has a higher family-household share (68% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Field vs Coonalpyn: common questions

Does Field or Coonalpyn have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coonalpyn scores 975 vs 942 in Field. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.