Side by sideSuburb comparison

Field vs Coonalpyn.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coonalpyn edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coonalpyn (975) sits above Field (942).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coonalpyn edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 942). Field also has a higher family-household share (68% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsField vs Coonalpyn

Common questions

Does Field or Coonalpyn have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coonalpyn scores 975 vs 942 in Field. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Field
Metric
Coonalpyn

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
32.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
8
Transit score
0
Bike score
5
83
Population
350
43
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
942
Avg ICSEA
975

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).