Side by sideSuburb comparison

Fiery Flat vs Wedderburn Junction.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wedderburn Junction edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wedderburn Junction (974) sits above Fiery Flat (967). Wedderburn Junction skews owner-occupied (56%), Fiery Flat runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wedderburn Junction edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 967). Fiery Flat also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsFiery Flat vs Wedderburn Junction

Common questions

Does Fiery Flat or Wedderburn Junction have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wedderburn Junction scores 974 vs 967 in Fiery Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Fiery Flat
Metric
Wedderburn Junction

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$170/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$170/wk
$145/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$145/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
28
Population
20
43
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
8
967
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).