Side by sideSuburb comparison

Figtree vs Kembla Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Figtree edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Figtree (1048) sits above Kembla Heights (1036).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Figtree edges out on average school ICSEA (1048 vs 1036). Figtree also has a higher family-household share (77% vs 59%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsFigtree vs Kembla Heights

Common questions

Does Figtree or Kembla Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Figtree scores 1048 vs 1036 in Kembla Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Figtree
Metric
Kembla Heights

Price & Market

$1,140,000
Median house
$352,800
Median unit
+3.6%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$790/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$750/wk
$500/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
17.0%
Renter occupied
97.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
35
12,335
Population
88
40
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1048
Avg ICSEA
1036

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).