Fitzgerald River National Park vs Jerramungup

Jerramungup scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Fitzgerald River National Park skews owner-occupied (100%), Jerramungup runs more rental-dense (42% owner).

Buying in Fitzgerald River National Park or Jerramungup?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.

Get the free buying guide

Selling in Fitzgerald River National Park? The free selling guide

Fitzgerald River National Park and Jerramungup side by side

Measure	Fitzgerald River National Park	Jerramungup
Renting
House rent	$210/wk	$160/wk
Unit rent	$179/wk	$170/wk
Owner occupied	100.0%	42.0%
Renter occupied	–	42.0%
Schools
Schools nearby	0	2
Average ICSEA	–	955
Lifestyle and people
Walk score	0	8
Transit score	0	0
Bike score	0	0
Population	4	353
Median age	54	37
Climate
Annual rainfall	444 mm	406 mm
Mean max, January	27.6°C	28.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers: We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors: Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families: School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.