Side by sideSuburb comparison

Flinders vs Cape Schanck.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,610,000 and $1,370,000.

Cape Schanck (median $1,370,000) is roughly 18% cheaper to buy into than Flinders ($1,610,000).

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Flinders (1010) sits above Cape Schanck (1009).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Cape Schanck is the lower entry point at $1,370,000 median, 18% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Flinders edges out on average school ICSEA (1010 vs 1009).

Common questionsFlinders vs Cape Schanck

Common questions

Is Flinders or Cape Schanck cheaper to buy in?

Cape Schanck has the lower median house price at $1,370,000, roughly 18% below Flinders ($1,610,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Does Flinders or Cape Schanck have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Flinders scores 1010 vs 1009 in Cape Schanck. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Flinders
Metric
Cape Schanck

Price & Market

$1,610,000
Median house
$1,370,000
$396,000
Median unit
$285,120
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$595/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$470/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
Owner occupied
92.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
Population
569
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
14
1010
Avg ICSEA
1009

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
25.3°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.3°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).