Side by sideSuburb comparison

Flying Fish Point vs Webb.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Webb edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Webb (884) sits above Flying Fish Point (866). Flying Fish Point skews owner-occupied (63%), Webb runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Webb edges out on average school ICSEA (884 vs 866).

Common questionsFlying Fish Point vs Webb

Common questions

Does Flying Fish Point or Webb have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Webb scores 884 vs 866 in Flying Fish Point. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Flying Fish Point
Metric
Webb

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$268/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$270/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
48.0%
32.0%
Renter occupied
38.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
5
395
Population
393
50
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
12
866
Avg ICSEA
884

Climate

2065 mm
Annual rainfall
2065 mm
31.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.5°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).