Side by sideSuburb comparison

Forest Grove vs Raglan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Forest Grove edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Forest Grove (985) sits above Raglan (979). Forest Grove skews owner-occupied (94%), Raglan runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Forest Grove edges out on average school ICSEA (985 vs 979). Forest Grove also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 79%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsForest Grove vs Raglan

Common questions

Does Forest Grove or Raglan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Forest Grove scores 985 vs 979 in Raglan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Forest Grove
Metric
Raglan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$288/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$366/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
115
Population
1,272
48
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
16
985
Avg ICSEA
979

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).