Forest Range vs Marble Hill

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Marble Hill (1090) sits above Forest Range (1059). Marble Hill skews owner-occupied (111%), Forest Range runs more rental-dense (88% owner).

Buying in Forest Range or Marble Hill?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Forest Range? The free selling guide

Forest Range and Marble Hill side by side

MeasureForest RangeMarble Hill
Renting
Owner occupied88.0%111.0%
Renter occupied13.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby1120
Average ICSEA10591090
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population29069
Median age3844
Climate
Annual rainfall860 mm848 mm
Mean max, January26.9°C27.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Marble Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (1090 vs 1059). Marble Hill also has a higher family-household share (116% vs 85%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Forest Range vs Marble Hill: common questions

Does Forest Range or Marble Hill have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Marble Hill scores 1090 vs 1059 in Forest Range. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.