Foresthome vs Macknade

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Foresthome (923) sits above Macknade (910). Foresthome skews owner-occupied (83%), Macknade runs more rental-dense (70% owner).

Buying in Foresthome or Macknade?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Foresthome? The free selling guide

Foresthome and Macknade side by side

MeasureForesthomeMacknade
Renting
Owner occupied83.0%70.0%
Renter occupied9.0%27.0%
Schools
Schools nearby911
Average ICSEA923910
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population84203
Median age5450
Climate
Annual rainfall2095 mm2142 mm
Mean max, January31.8°C31.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Foresthome edges out on average school ICSEA (923 vs 910). Macknade also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Foresthome vs Macknade: common questions

Does Foresthome or Macknade have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Foresthome scores 923 vs 910 in Macknade. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.