Fork Lagoons vs Mount Macarthur

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fork Lagoons (937) sits above Mount Macarthur (924). Mount Macarthur skews owner-occupied (100%), Fork Lagoons runs more rental-dense (31% owner).

Buying in Fork Lagoons or Mount Macarthur?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Fork Lagoons? The free selling guide

Fork Lagoons and Mount Macarthur side by side

MeasureFork LagoonsMount Macarthur
Renting
Owner occupied31.0%100.0%
Renter occupied31.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby35
Average ICSEA937924
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population3331
Median age2831
Climate
Annual rainfall501 mm535 mm
Mean max, January34.2°C33.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Fork Lagoons edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 924). Mount Macarthur also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Fork Lagoons vs Mount Macarthur: common questions

Does Fork Lagoons or Mount Macarthur have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fork Lagoons scores 937 vs 924 in Mount Macarthur. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.