Foul Bay vs White Hut
White Hut skews owner-occupied (88%), Foul Bay runs more rental-dense (77% owner).
Buying in Foul Bay or White Hut?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Foul Bay? The free selling guide
Foul Bay and White Hut side by side
| Measure | Foul Bay | White Hut |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 77.0% | 88.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 1 | 1 |
| Average ICSEA | 955 | 955 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 40 | 12 |
| Median age | 59 | 51 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 447 mm | 422 mm |
| Mean max, January | 26.1°C | 26.4°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Foul Bay with
Choosing between Foul Bay and White Hut?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.