Foulden vs Mount Pleasant

Mount Pleasant scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 22/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Foulden (982) sits above Mount Pleasant (970).

Buying in Foulden or Mount Pleasant?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Foulden? The free selling guide

Foulden and Mount Pleasant side by side

MeasureFouldenMount Pleasant
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA982970
Lifestyle and people
Walk score022
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population9–
Median age45–
Climate
Annual rainfall1487 mm1570 mm
Mean max, January30.8°C30.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Foulden edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 970).

Foulden vs Mount Pleasant: common questions

Does Foulden or Mount Pleasant have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Foulden scores 982 vs 970 in Mount Pleasant. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Foulden or Mount Pleasant?

Mount Pleasant scores 22/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.