Side by sideSuburb comparison

Freestone vs Sladevale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Freestone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Freestone (953) sits above Sladevale (950). Sladevale skews owner-occupied (89%), Freestone runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Freestone edges out on average school ICSEA (953 vs 950). Sladevale also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsFreestone vs Sladevale

Common questions

Does Freestone or Sladevale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Freestone scores 953 vs 950 in Sladevale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Freestone
Metric
Sladevale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$260/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
76.0%
Owner occupied
89.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
208
Population
433
43
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
11
953
Avg ICSEA
950

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).