Side by sideSuburb comparison

Fulham vs Cooeeimbardi.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cooeeimbardi edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cooeeimbardi (966) sits above Fulham (957).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cooeeimbardi edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 957).

Common questionsFulham vs Cooeeimbardi

Common questions

Does Fulham or Cooeeimbardi have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cooeeimbardi scores 966 vs 957 in Fulham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Fulham
Metric
Cooeeimbardi

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$221/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied
75.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
2,316
Population
9
52
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
5
957
Avg ICSEA
966

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).