Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gabbadah vs Seabird.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gabbadah edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gabbadah (981) sits above Seabird (968). Gabbadah skews owner-occupied (90%), Seabird runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gabbadah edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 968). Gabbadah also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 48%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGabbadah vs Seabird

Common questions

Does Gabbadah or Seabird have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gabbadah scores 981 vs 968 in Seabird. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gabbadah
Metric
Seabird

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
90.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
764
Population
107
52
Median age
64

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
7
981
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).