Side by sideSuburb comparison

Garbutt vs Rowes Bay.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Garbutt scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rowes Bay (944) sits above Garbutt (926).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Rowes Bay edges out on average school ICSEA (944 vs 926).

Common questionsGarbutt vs Rowes Bay

Common questions

Does Garbutt or Rowes Bay have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rowes Bay scores 944 vs 926 in Garbutt. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Garbutt or Rowes Bay?

Garbutt scores 30/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Garbutt
Metric
Rowes Bay

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$550/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
41.0%
Owner occupied
46.0%
55.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

30
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
30
2,309
Population
541
42
Median age
69

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
926
Avg ICSEA
944

Climate

1036 mm
Annual rainfall
1036 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).